I ran across these two articles, linked from the Gadling site -- "a blog ... about “engaged” travel".
The thrill of riding Reno’s rapids
Along the Missouri with Lewis and Clark
I have more important stories on my list, about drought and conservation and more, but these stories caught my attention. I wondered why I was both attracted and repelled by them, in differing measures. Let me take the Lewis and Clark story first.
Harland Ellison once wrote, "Americans only use history as sauce for our french fries." (Though he may have been quoting someone else.) Sauce or not, there are certinaly worse excuses for travel. Hell, my folks toured Civil War battlefieds on their honeymoon (no money to do anything else besides drive around in my Dad's Mustang.) But the tone of the LA Times article was so self-satisfied, it got to me.
Put it this way: Civil War re-enactors are engaging with the defining American event. Maybe they're doing it because they enjoy playing dress-up, but you can't dress up like a member of the Iron Brigade and not think about 1) why those men from Indiana and Wisconsin and Michigan were fighting; and 2) the high prioce they paid.
But floating down the Missouri in the "footsteps" of Lewis and Clark feels like escaping the reality of what the Corps of Discovery mission augured. Around five years ago, I drove from Chicago to California. For a lot of the way, my partner Max and I followed in the footsteps of the Corps. Mostly you're talking highways and backroads. But the most resonant part of the drive is when we cut south from Missoula, MT, heading toward Idaho. For the better part of a hundred miles, the two-lane road twists and loops through mountains dedicated to two things: logging and fishing. If all you noticed was the fishing, it would seem like one of the most beautiful places on earth. But so many of the mountain sides were blasted earth, dotted with stumps and heavy machinery.
The arguments that fueled the Civil War are still in play today. But the goals that drove Lewis and Clark resulted in the environmental probems that have to get fixed today. (And yeah, I'm aware of the irony of yipping about attitudes toward the environment after describing driving a gas-guzzling car through that environment.)
My mixed reaction to the Reno story is a bit simpler. Kayaking the Truckee River through Reno, especially at night with the neon flashing over you and the water, sounds like a cool experience. I mean, what does Reno have to offer that Vegas doesn't do better? For one thing, they have an actual, authentic river running through the town. Why not take advantage?
But the story played up the idea that this kind of specially-created waterway in the middle of a town was unique to the Reno geniuses. But South Bend has had the same thing since 1984, using the St. Joe River where it goes through downtown. The 2004 Olympic Trials were held there. Credit where credit is due, people!
Anyway, I've seen the Truckee through Reno, and I have trouble imagining that that whitewater track is significantly better than the East Race on the St. Joe. On the other hand, you have to drive all the way over to Michigan City to play blackjack.