This has been an ongoing problem since 2004, the high level of water in Lake Okeechobee. It has been choking the fish and plantlife in the lake, because sunlight can't get through as easily. I don't know details of testing for water quality, but the alst time I took a personal look at Okeechobee was about two months ago, and it looked just about as brown and sluggish as it did last year.
Water worries grow as engineers propose lowering Lake Okeechobee by a foot
By Andy Reid
South Florida Sun-Sentinel
Posted
September 19 2006
Two turbulent hurricane
seasons, coupled with concerns about an aging dike, persuaded water
managers to come up with a new plan to lower Lake Okeechobee.
But lowering the level of the 730-square-mile lake about a foot, as
proposed, creates water supply ripple effects felt by some of South
Florida's most powerful interest groups.
Sugar cane growers,
environmentalists, fishermen, the Seminoles and cities from the lake to
the coast have a stake in changing lake water levels.
This article is the lead story at the Sun-Sentinel website today. It's almost emblematic of the coverage form, because it covers every one of the classic POVs. Here's the competing quotes in a nutshell.
A story like this almost always starts off with the embattled Army Corps of Engineers, fumbling around while trying to satisfy everyone and still serve the environment.
The push for a new lake plan came after hurricanes in 2004 and 2005
left the lake close to the 18.5-foot mark, where the potential
increases for erosion of the 140-mile Herbert Hoover Dike. High water
in the lake also chokes the aquatic plants that provide habitat and
spawning grounds for fish and other wildlife.
A proposal from the Army Corps of Engineers calls for capping the
maximum lake level at 17.25 feet instead of letting it creep past 18
feet. That would take pressure off the 70-year-old earthen dike and
improve the environmental health of the lake, according to the Army
Corps.
Fair enough, right? but here comes the first objection. FLorida citizens who want to drink water on a daily basis.
The Seminole Tribe of Florida objected to how the new plan could affect
its water supply. South Florida cities use the lake as backup drinking
water during drought.
...
The Seminoles are
"extremely concerned" the new plan does not do enough to protect their
water supply, tribe representative Michelle Diffenderfer said.
"This all has cascading impacts," Diffenderfer said.
(BTW, I know this probably makes me a bad person, but the idea of a Seminole spoesperson named "Diffenderfer" just cracks me up. It might be a married name, but I wonder if Major William Lauderdale ever wrote in his diary during one of the Sminole Wars about the night terrors of the Lurking Diffenderfer".)
So after the locals, in this case the Seminoles, talk about drinking water issues, you get either the business complaint (either developers or growers) or the environmental group complaint.
This time, it's the growers who come first.
Despite assurances from water managers, growers question whether they will get the water they need.
Sugar cane growers lost
$50 million during the drought of 2001 when there wasn't enough lake
water flowing to irrigation canals to help save crops, said Charles
Shinn, who monitors water issues for the Florida Farm Bureau. The new
lake plan needs to allow agriculture a larger say in how to manage lake
levels when the rains stop, he said.
"There is some discomfort," Shinn said. "We have got a lot at stake out there."
Whenever I read "sugar cane growers" instead of the name of an actual farmer, I always assume it's code for a corporate farm, or some other plutocratic farm owner. Not the sugar cane growing equivalent of Mom and Pop Kent, growing corn in Iowa while Clark learns how to fight for truth, justice and the American Grange.
Maybe Charles Shinn is totally straight up, but I am finding that every story about water issues needs about 50 pages of disclosure to understand the issues below the surface.
After the growers, the enviros get their shot.
While the new lake plan does help protect the dike, it needs to do more to protect the environment, said Eric Draper, deputy director of Audubon of Florida.
Lowering the lake too far could damage the habitat of apple snails, which takes away the food source of the threatened snail kites -- hawks that once flew in greater numbers around the lake, Draper said.
"They could end up managing the lake too low," Draper said. "The lake is still being managed primarily as a reservoir."
...
Water managers shouldn't "play to the crowd" when they finalize changes to the current six-year-old lake level standards, Palm Beach County environmental activist Rosa Durando said.
"We are trying to do ... long-range problem solving," said Durando, of the Audubon Society of the Everglades.
In any case, the important thing for Florida residents to know is that the Corps is planning to hold public hearings this month, so they can finalize a plan by November. The written comment period ends October 2, and there's supposed to be a hearing in Lake Worth.
You can send comments to the Corps at:
http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/functions/cw/hot_topics/sendme.htm